Leaders at the K-12 and higher-ed levels are grappling with how to safely bring students back to campus—and wearable trackers may help

As schools, colleges and universities navigate the new school year, teachers and administrators will be serving on the front lines of public health efforts to keep kids and communities safe from COVID-19 outbreaks. To do that, educators will need to do two things that public health officials struggle to do even when working with adults: ensure that social distancing is maintained and conduct effective contact tracing as suspected/confirmed cases arise.

Those tasks are difficult enough with adults but are even more challenging with young people for reasons that everyone who spends time with children knows: kids are always in motion and have a hard time not entering other people’s personal space. In fact, that’s a big part of what makes kids kids: they zoom around like hummingbirds; and while zooming around, they constantly form and re-form groups with other kids, all clumped together. It’s what kids do, and it makes monitoring social distancing and contact tracing without help a lot to ask of teachers, professors, and administrators.

Related content: Three critical steps to online learning success

New wearable technology, however, provides an innovative way for schools, colleges, and universities to augment what the adults are doing to keep people safe. These trackers can play a vital role in both social distancing and contract tracing. Wearable trackers may sound like something out of a dystopian young adult novel, but they are designed to ensure privacy and cannot be used to actively track students. Instead, they focus on measuring the physical distance to other students’ wearables trackers – signaling to let students know when they are forgetting to socially distance.

As schools, colleges and universities navigate the new school year, teachers and administrators will be serving on the front lines of public health efforts to keep kids and communities safe from COVID-19 outbreaks. To do that, educators will need to do two things that public health officials struggle to do even when working with adults: ensure that social distancing is maintained and conduct effective contact tracing as suspected/confirmed cases arise.

Those tasks are difficult enough with adults but are even more challenging with young people for reasons that everyone who spends time with children knows: kids are always in motion and have a hard time not entering other people’s personal space. In fact, that’s a big part of what makes kids kids: they zoom around like hummingbirds; and while zooming around, they constantly form and re-form groups with other kids, all clumped together. It’s what kids do, and it makes monitoring social distancing and contact tracing without help a lot to ask of teachers, professors, and administrators.

Related content: 9 student observations about online learning

New wearable technology, however, provides an innovative way for schools, colleges, and universities to augment what the adults are doing to keep people safe. These trackers can play a vital role in both social distancing and contract tracing. Wearable trackers may sound like something out of a dystopian young adult novel, but they are designed to ensure privacy and cannot be used to actively track students. Instead, they focus on measuring the physical distance to other students’ wearables trackers – signaling to let students know when they are forgetting to socially distance.

The wearable trackers also remember which other trackers they have been near over the course of the day, allowing public health officials to quickly conduct contact tracing for students that need to self-quarantine. In this way, wearable trackers are never monitoring or logging location data (which is a major privacy concern), but simply tracking which other trackers they come into contact with and storing that list if schools, colleges, and universities need to determine who has come into contact with a sick student.

Let’s look at social distancing more closely. These types of trackers are discreet and come in several wearable forms, such as a clip, pendant, or wristband. The devices can then sense when they’re in close proximity with another such device/user and alert users either through visual LEDs, beeper, or vibration. The technology is unobtrusive and represents a technological equivalent of the gentle reminder that a teacher or professor would give to students. In this way, wearable trackers can serve as an extension of the hard work teachers, staff, and administrators are doing.

These wearable trackers also play a critical role in augmenting what students and adults are able to jointly do when contact tracing is necessary. Traditional contact tracing would require the students and adults to retrace their steps over the course of 2-3 prior days – remembering everyone they came into contact with. That is very hard to do quickly and accurately, but the wearable trackers remove the chance for human error and provide critical data to ensure successful contact tracking. In order to build a timeline for contact tracing, it’s necessary to log all instances of contact, so that if someone is infected, the people they’ve been exposed to can be notified and checked for illness. This means contact data needs to be logged on the wearable tracker, and then uploaded to the cloud for analysis to help establish linkage and identify people who have come into contact with an infected person.

The challenges of ensuring social distancing and conducting rapid, accurate contact tracing is clearly distinctive in different types of educational settings, but these kinds of wearable trackers can be highly effective in each type of school. Let’s look at large college campuses as an example. These campuses, particularly those where students are living on campus, are very difficult places to ensure social distancing and conduct contact tracing because of close living quarters, congregate dining facilities, and other factors. Campuses function on a schedule of moving between buildings and classes, and often feature open areas of congregation and large indoor study and dining halls. On a campus, it can be practically impossible to fully avoid exposure to others, and because learning and teaching involve person-to-person interactions by default, the potential for human error and closer-than-intended exposure is high.
source: Read More, eSchool News

Leave a Reply